Resistance is Futile
In the 19th century, the Luddites were a group of workers who refused to accept the introduction of machinery into the process of textiles. So threatened did they feel by the mechanical looms that they often resorted to violence and destruction. At worst, they burned entire factories; at best, they resisted every advance of the industrial revolution with marches, pamphlets and the passage of restrictive laws. Eventually, however, the Luddites came to learn an important lesson:
Resistance is futile.
A new report from Baylor University’s research department was released this week. Researchers asked 50,000 agents what they did to generate new business (leads), convert the consumer’s interest into an appointment and then turn appointments into deals. You can read the report for yourself, but to save you some time, let me give you some analytical observations:
- The report seems to have found mostly “optimistic” agents – which is good news. About 68% of the respondents said the market was better-to-somewhat-better than the national average. The question remains, how did the respondents really come to that conclusion – other than intuition – but at least it gives some perspective on their attitudes.
- The report also found that on average, the respondents reported about a 10% list-to-sale deviation in all markets. In other words, REALTORS are consistently overpricing properties by about 10% of what they ultimately sell for. On a $300,000 home, that’s a $30,000 price deviation.
- The REALTORS who replied said they kept good records of their lead generation efforts. 70% of them claimed they kept detailed lead generation records. No way. Just can’t believe that – considering 50% of the NAR respondents (a larger sample) said they used software like contact management, document management and CMS tools only a “few times a week”. Sounds like the respondents to Baylor were too embarrassed to be honest.
But here are the goodies:
- The largest lead-generating activities performed by the REALTORS was Direct Mail (23% of spending)
- Print advertising followed closely with 14% of their spending. This means 37% of their marketing budgets went to paper, print, postage.
- “Internet activity” only accounted for 17% of their lead generating activity.
- Less than 10% of budget went to generating referrals. And only 6% to repeat business.
- Under 5% of budgets was spent on promoting Open Houses.
So, why does any of this matter? Because it’s an example of Luddite mentality. Forget the new machinery of the real estate business. We’ve been doing it this way for decades and we’re not about to stop now!
Ironically, the very SAME respondents told the researchers:
- The two most productive sources of leads were REFERRALS and REPEAT business
- The two least productive sources of leads were Direct Mail and Print Media
The activities they spent the MOST amount of budget on created the LEAST amount of new business; the activities that they spent the LEAST amount of budget on created the MOST amount of new business.
Can you now see why the industry is a mess?
The question becomes, not what to do about it, but WHO is responsible for doing something about it. You already KNOW what to do about it – stop doing mailings and print ads and start spending every dollar getting referrals and repeat business. There isn’t a knowledge problem here. There’s a DOING problem.
The only person who can solve this is the Manager/Broker. Agents aren’t going to do it on their own, because it would require too much resistance. Too much work would be involved in convincing sellers why print ads don’t work or having to follow up with past clients rather than doing blind mass-mailings to mailboxes (not people) in the neighborhood. In an industry that is basically adverse to both conflict (known as properly advising clients or walking away from bad deals) and prospecting (known as picking up the phone or emailing, IM’ing and social networking with past clients), nothing is going to change until the Manager steps into the game.
During the industrial revolution, it wasn’t the workers who invented the machinery. They didn’t look at the work and say, let’s do this better, faster, cheaper. It was the owners of the factory. The bosses. The managers. Workers were very happy doing what they always did, and getting what they always got. It was managers who said, more can be done, better, faster, easier. And in the ultimate test of their convictions, workers salaries and standards of living only started to rise after the introduction of modern equipment. As factories could produce more, cheaper goods, more consumers could purchase them and that brought in more sales. More revenue. Higher wages. Better lives for the workers.
If you’re wondering why REALTORS are leaving the industry so fast – and always have, at a rate of 90% attrition every 5 years – if you’re wondering why 75% of all agents made UNDER $45,000 last year, with no benefits, vacation, health insurance or retirement plans – if you’re wondering why it’s BEEN THIS WAY for decades, even though more technology, more marketing, more tools have been available than ever, ask yourself this:
When will you decide that resistance is futile?













I am against the $85,000,000,000.00 bailout of AIG.
Instead, I’m in favor of giving that money to America in a We Deserve It Dividend.
To make the math simple, let’s assume there are 2000,000,000 bonafide U.S. Citizens 18+.
Our population is about 301,000,000 +/- counting every man, woman and child. So 200,000,000 might be a fair stab at adults 18 and up..
So divide 200 million adults 18+ into $85 billon that equals $425,000.00. Give that amount to ever person 18+ as a “We Deserve It Dividend”. Of course, it would not be tax free. So let’s assume a tax rate of 30%. Every individual 18+ has to pay $127,500.00 in taxes. That send $25,500,000,000 right back to Uncle Sam. But it means that every adult 18+ has $279,500.00 in their pocket. A husband and wife has $595,000.00.
What would you do with $279,500.00 to $595,000.00 in your family? Pay off your mortgage – housing crisis solved. Repay college loans – what a great boost to new grads. Put away money for college – it’ll be there. Save in a bank – create money to loan to entrepreneurs. Buy a new car – create jobs. Invest in the market – Capital drives growth. Pay for your parent’s medical insurance – health care improves. Enable Deadbeat Dads to come clean or else….
Remember this is for every adult US Citizen 18+ including the folks who lost their jobs at Lehman Brothers and every other company that is cutting back. And of course, for those serving in our Armed Forces.
If we are going to re-distribute wealth let’s really do it… instead of trickling out a puny $1000.00 economic incentive that is being proposed by one of our candidates for President.
If we are going to do an $85 billion bailout, let’s bail out every adult US Citizen 18+!
As for AIG – liquidate it.
Sell off its parts.
Let American General go back to being American General.
Sell off the real estate.
Let the private sector bargain hunters cut it up and clean it up.
Hear’s my rationale. We deserve it and AIG doesn’t.
Sure it’s a crazy idea that can work. How do y ou spell Economic Boom?
And remember, The Family plan only really costs $59.5 Billion because $25.5 Billion is returned instantly in taxes to Uncle Sam!
Thank you.
Hi Jean:
Thanks for your email – it’s certainly a well thought out idea. However, I’m afraid I have to differ with you on one issue: “We” don’t deserve anything. In fact, to do the bailout, the government has to TAKE money from someone – you, perhaps? – to give it to me. The government doesn’t “make” money – it doesn’t sell goods or services for a profit, which it might then “give” to citizens through some sort of altruistic formula. Rather, any money it gets it must take – forcibly, through taxation without recourse – from some people to give to others.
Which is why there should certainly be no bailout; because I’m not interested in having my money taken to bail out a failed company or irresponsible homeowners. Certainly, government contributed to the problem through bad policies, regulation and political maneuvering; but if it wants to bail anything out (notably, itself) then it should simply redirect all non-essential expenditures (military, courts) from the existing tax revenues to do it.
But it most certainly shouldn’t “give” anything to anyone – except perhaps returning the money it already takes back to those who it took it from in the first place.
Want to energize the economy? Cut takes in half across the boards. Let people keep their own money – they will spend it as they see fit – lowering their mortgages or buying consumer goods – or buying stocks in AIG, to keep it afloat.
Everything else is just another Ponzi scheme financed by your children’s future.